California Workplace Rights and Wage-Claim FAQ

Looking for an overview of representation and services? Visit the Employment practice page →

Review the primary official source.

Before submitting a workplace complaint, check for mistakes that can send the right facts through the wrong process. A wage-claim button does not also file a retaliation complaint. A saved CRD draft is not a signed complaint. And an immediate CRD right-to-sue request does not file an EEOC charge. This FAQ uses those concrete filing problems to help you check a submission already being prepared—not to choose every claim or calculate every deadline.

Is a wage claim the same as a discrimination complaint?

No. The Labor Commissioner’s wage-claim filing page expressly warns that its online wage-claim button does not file retaliation, PAGA, public-works, or other claims. For example, a worker alleging missing overtime and punishment for requesting it should not assume that describing both in a wage form completes both filing processes. Check the actual form title and confirmation, then obtain advice about any separate complaint. Do not submit a second copy of the same wage claim merely to add a different legal label.

What records help prove unpaid wages?

Test a sample pay period before submitting a total. Match the dates on the wage statement to the days worked, then distinguish hours recorded, hours paid, and the payment actually received. If a figure is reconstructed from memory, label it an estimate and explain how it was reached; do not present it as a contemporaneous time record. DLSE asks for available employer information, time and pay records. Missing documents are a problem to explain, not a reason to invent entries. Its instructions say to attach applicable documents if available.

Can an employer retaliate after a complaint?

Firing someone for filing a CRD complaint is unlawful retaliation, as the department explains in its complaint-process FAQ. But a submission should distinguish what the worker reported from how the employer learned about it. For example: A complaint emailed only to an outside agency does not itself show that a particular supervisor had read it before changing a schedule. State the known dates and communications; identify uncertainty rather than filling it with a conclusion that the timing proves motive. The governing protection depends on the complaint and law involved.

What if there is an arbitration agreement?

Include the actual agreement rather than writing only “I signed arbitration.” A signature page without the pages it adopts can leave counsel unable to identify the rules, parties, or dispute covered. If there are two versions, keep both and say which you remember receiving; do not silently combine them. Tell counsel about a demand, fee notice, or court application already received. This document check does not decide enforceability or mean an agreement eliminates an agency process. Review the agreement before relying on it to select or abandon a route.

How do CRD and EEOC interact?

Check the route actually selected. CRD’s immediate right-to-sue instructions specifically say that CRD will not file that complaint with EEOC. A worker who used that route should not check a worksheet box marked “federal charge filed” merely because CRD issued a notice. Keep the CRD document and any separate EEOC confirmation under different headings. If someone says a matter was dual-filed, ask for the actual agency confirmation; this FAQ does not treat every state filing as a federal one.

What should happen before signing severance?

Check whether the document is a proposed agreement, an unsigned draft, an executed agreement, or an employer’s description of an offer. Those are not interchangeable. Include attachments and later revisions, and identify any response date printed in the offer. A sentence saying that the worker “received severance” can conceal that nothing has been signed or paid. Tell counsel the actual status and ask what the proposed release would cover before signing. Do not assume every offer has the same consideration or revocation period, or that this checklist decides whether a particular term is lawful.

What first steps help after termination or retaliation?

Make a short list of what has already happened procedurally: An HR report, saved agency draft, submitted intake, signed complaint, right-to-sue request, or court filing. Use the actual document name and date for each. Do not write “case filed” for all of them. CRD explains that an intake submission leads to evaluation and, if accepted, a complaint prepared for signature. It also says an unfiled complaint remains in its online system for thirty days. A saved draft should therefore prompt a status check; do not assume it completed the required step.

When is CRD, EEOC, the Labor Commissioner, arbitration, or court the right forum?

This FAQ is for people already preparing or checking a submission. If you have not started, review the employment practice overview and seek advice about the appropriate initial route. For an existing filing, first identify what each paper asks the recipient to do. A DLSE wage form seeks unpaid wages or benefits; a CRD intake describes matters for the department to screen; an immediate right-to-sue request elects a different CRD route. None is simply a universal employment complaint. Make a cover sheet listing each submission, its recipient, current status, and confirmation or missing confirmation. Bring that sheet and the full papers to counsel to decide what is still required. An arbitration clause or an informal HR response does not answer that question by itself.

What does a right-to-sue notice change?

For an immediate CRD notice, check the date printed on the notice and who is named as respondent. The department’s instructions say the worker has one year from the notice date to file suit and warn that CRD will not investigate the complaint even if the worker later decides not to sue. A request for the notice is not the lawsuit itself. The instructions also request respondent and agent-for-service contact information. Flag an incorrect employer name or missing notice promptly; do not assume correcting a worksheet changes a filed document or extends a deadline.

How should evidence be collected without creating another problem?

Keep a clean source copy and a separate working copy when adding highlights or notes. A cropped screenshot can hide the sender, date, or reply that changes the meaning; include the complete conversation lawfully available to you. Mark a reconstructed explanation as your note rather than inserting it into the original message. Do not reenter a former employer’s system, obtain a coworker’s password, or take privileged or confidential files merely to complete an attachment list. Identify inaccessible material for counsel instead of trying to retrieve it without authorization.

How should the different filing deadlines be organized?

Use separate rows for separate acts. The EEOC’s timing guidance gives an example of a demotion followed by firing a year later: Filing promptly after firing does not make the earlier demotion timely. It also says internal grievances, arbitration, or mediation generally do not extend its charge deadline. Its harassment and Equal Pay Act discussions have different rules. Record the event, claim, applicable process, and source for each deadline; do not copy a single “employment deadline” across the sheet. Ask promptly about uncertain dates rather than waiting to perfect the packet.

How do lawyers assess remedies, fees, and fit?

Make the requested task clear. Do you need an urgent deadline assessment, correction of a filing, representation in an existing agency matter, or review of an offer? A stack of records without that question can consume time without resolving the immediate decision. Disclose existing counsel, submissions, agreements, and upcoming notices at the outset. Ask what work the proposed fee covers, how costs are handled, and what remains outside the engagement. A completed packet is not a promise that counsel will accept the matter or that any particular remedy is available.

This page provides general information, not advice for a particular matter. Deadlines and available procedures depend on the governing notice, tribunal, and record.