Tax Legal Services · Primary-source case analysis
Tellier: Business-Related Criminal Defense Fees Were Deductible
Commissioner v. Tellier considered deductions for criminal-defense costs arising directly from conduct in the taxpayer’s underwriting and securities-dealing business.
The origin of the expense was the business
The prosecution arose from the taxpayer’s income-producing securities activities rather than a personal matter.
Legal defense was ordinary and necessary
Hiring counsel to defend against criminal charges was a normal and appropriate response to business-related accusations.
Deduction was not a reward for wrongdoing
The income-tax system taxes net income and does not generally condition deductions on moral approval.
No sharply defined public policy barred the deduction
Allowing defense costs did not frustrate a specific governmental policy comparable to deducting a fine or penalty.
Key takeaways
- Apply the origin-of-the-claim test to legal fees.
- Separate defense costs from fines, penalties, and forfeitures.
- Document the connection to the taxpayer’s trade or business.
- Check current statutory disallowance rules before relying on Tellier.
Discuss the procedural record
Mishra X Trial Lawyers represents clients in California. Call (949) 343-9735 or email office@mishrax.com.