Employment Litigation ยท Primary-source case analysis

Raines: A Business-Entity Agent May Be Directly Liable Under FEHA

Decision: Supreme Court of California, S273630, decided August 21, 2023. Document: Published California Supreme Court opinion.

Job applicants alleged that an occupational-health provider used an overbroad preemployment medical questionnaire on behalf of prospective employers. The Ninth Circuit asked whether FEHA's definition of employer permits direct liability against a business-entity agent.

The statutory definition includes an employer's agent

FEHA defines employer to include a person acting as an agent of an employer. The language can impose direct obligations on a business entity that carries out delegated employment functions.

Business entities differ from individual supervisors

Earlier decisions protecting individual supervisors from personal liability did not control a claim against a business that regularly performs employer services and can bear compliance costs.

Agency depends on delegated FEHA functions

Liability is not automatic for every vendor. The entity must exercise authority delegated by the employer over conduct regulated by FEHA, and the alleged violation must arise from that role.

The holding did not decide ultimate liability

The court answered the certified legal question and left factual agency, statutory coverage, and the merits of the questionnaire claims for further proceedings.

Key takeaways

Discuss the procedural record

Mishra X Trial Lawyers represents clients in California. Call (949) 343-9735 or email office@mishrax.com.