Employment Litigation · Primary-source case analysis

Morgan: Discrete Employment Acts and Hostile-Environment Timeliness

Decision: Supreme Court of the United States, No. 00-1614, decided June 10, 2002. Document: Published United States Reports opinion.

Morgan supplies the claim-by-claim framework for applying Title VII’s administrative charge deadline.

The charge described years of alleged misconduct

Abner Morgan alleged repeated discipline, refusals to hire, and a racially hostile environment. Many events occurred outside the statutory charge period.

Discrete acts occur on identifiable dates

Termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, and refusal to hire are independently actionable acts. Each must occur within the charge period and cannot be revived merely by labeling it part of a continuing violation.

A hostile environment is one cumulative unlawful practice

Hostile-environment liability depends on the combined effect of repeated conduct. If one act contributing to the same environment is timely, the court may consider the entire period, subject to equitable defenses.

Disposition

The Court affirmed consideration of the full hostile-environment claim but reversed as to untimely discrete acts. It did not eliminate tolling, waiver, estoppel, or laches where properly established.

Key takeaways

Discuss the procedural record

Mishra X Trial Lawyers represents clients in California. Call (949) 343-9735 or email office@mishrax.com.