Employment Litigation · Primary-source case analysis
Meacham: The Employer Bears the RFOA Burden
Primary source: Read the filed decision PDF.
Decision: Supreme Court of the United States, No. 06-1505, decided June 19, 2008. Document: Published United States Reports opinion.
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory allocates proof on the ADEA disparate-impact defense.
A reduction in force disproportionately selected older workers
Managers scored employees on performance, flexibility, and critical skills, producing layoffs concentrated among workers over forty.
The plaintiffs identified the challenged criteria
Statistical proof and the subjective scoring factors supported the disparate-impact theory.
RFOA is an affirmative defense
The statutory exception for reasonable factors other than age places the burden of proving reasonableness on the employer.
The case was remanded
The Court did not hold every subjective criterion unlawful; it required application of the correct burden allocation.
Key takeaways
- Define each selection factor before implementation.
- Retain scoring instructions and contemporaneous records.
- Test age impact before final selections.
- Be prepared to prove the factor’s reasonableness.
Discuss the procedural record
Mishra X Trial Lawyers represents clients in California. Call (949) 343-9735 or email office@mishrax.com.