Tax Legal Services · Primary-source case analysis

Hughes Properties: A Fixed Liability May Accrue Before the Payee Is Known

Decision: Supreme Court of the United States, No. 84-930, decided June 3, 1986. Document: Published United States Reports opinion.

Hughes Properties increased progressive slot-machine jackpots as customers played. At each year end, it accrued the displayed amounts as business expenses even though no patron had yet won those jackpots.

The all-events test requires a fixed liability

An accrual-method taxpayer may deduct an expense when all events fixing liability have occurred and the amount is determinable with reasonable accuracy. A mere reserve for a contingent future obligation does not qualify.

Nevada law made the jackpot irrevocable

Once the machine displayed an increased jackpot, the casino could not reduce it or remove the machine from play without preserving the amount for another machine. That regulatory obligation fixed the liability beyond the casino’s control.

The payee and payment date could remain unknown

The identity of the future winner and the timing of the win did not make the liability contingent. Absolute liability was necessary; certainty that it would be discharged at a particular time to a particular person was not.

Tax accounting remained subject to anti-abuse controls

The Court found no evidence that the casino manipulated jackpots to avoid tax and noted the Commissioner’s authority to require an accounting method that clearly reflects income. The holding did not validate artificial reserves lacking a fixed legal obligation.

Key takeaways

Discuss the procedural record

Mishra X Trial Lawyers represents clients in California. Call (949) 343-9735 or email office@mishrax.com.