Employment Litigation ยท Primary-source case analysis

Hishon: Title VII Reaches Discriminatory Denial of Partnership Consideration

Decision: Supreme Court of the United States, No. 82-940, decided May 22, 1984. Document: Published United States Reports opinion.

Hishon v. King & Spalding began when a female associate alleged that the firm refused to consider her for partnership because of sex and then terminated her after she protested. The lower courts dismissed on the theory that partnership selection fell outside Title VII.

Title VII covers more than salary and discharge

The statute prohibits discrimination with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. A benefit that forms part of the employment relationship can fall within that language even if receiving the benefit would later change the individual's legal status.

The alleged partnership track was part of associate employment

Taking the complaint as true, the firm recruited associates with an understanding that they would be considered for partnership after a set period. The opportunity for consideration therefore could be a protected employment privilege.

Contract labels did not remove the statutory protection

An employer may not avoid Title VII by characterizing a promised employment benefit as discretionary or by locating the ultimate decision in a separate organizational status. The statute reaches discriminatory denial of the opportunity itself.

The Court decided pleading sufficiency, not ultimate liability

The judgment dismissing the complaint was reversed. The Court did not decide whether discrimination occurred, whether the plaintiff would have become a partner, or every question about Title VII's application to partnership relationships.

Key takeaways

Discuss the procedural record

Mishra X Trial Lawyers represents clients in California. Call (949) 343-9735 or email office@mishrax.com.